14th
Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year C. Luke
10:1-12, 17-20.
AIM: To
warn against nationalism and encourage patriotism.
Three days ago we celebrated
the 243rd anniversary of our country’s independence. The gospel reading we have
just heard speaks, however, not of independence but of dependence. “I am
sending you like lambs among wolves,” Jesus tells his disciples. Sheep are
grass eating animals which spend much of their lives grazing. Wolves on the
other hand are meat eating, always on the prowl for unsuspecting prey. Sheep,
and especially young lambs, are among their favorites.
So when Jesus tells his
disciples that he is sending them like lambs among wolves, he is reminding them
of their vulnerability. Far from
instructing them to outfit themselves with equipment to reduce this
vulnerability and make them independent, however, he orders them to do the
opposite. They are to leave behind even such basic necessities as shoes, food,
and money -- items which would make them inviting targets of wolfish greed.
They are to remain sheep-like and vulnerable, completely dependent on him as
shepherd.
We Americans need no
reminder of our vulnerability as we celebrate Independence Day this year. The
morning headlines, and the evening television news, show us daily the terrorist
wolves which surround us. The limits to our cherished independence are painful
for us Americans. For well over a century, roughly until the First World War of
1914-1918, we were confident that two broad oceans protected us from foreign
wars and enemies. No more. The terrorist attacks of 9/11/2001, removed forever
any doubt on that score. What is the appropriate response?
To that question there is
no lack of answers. In the end they come down to two. The first is the response of nationalism.
The second seems similar, but is in reality quite different: patriotism.
A spokesman for nationalism is the
American naval hero, Stephen Decatur.
Born in Maryland
as the son of a naval officer in 1779, he entered the navy himself age the age
of nineteen. In 1804, when only twenty-five, he commanded an American warship
which sailed into the harbor of Tripoli in North Africa, where the U.S. frigate Philadelphia had been captured, after
running aground. To prevent those who had taken the ship from enjoying their
prize, Decatur
set the frigate afire and bombarded the town. This was the first of many
similar exploits which, in the words of the encyclopedia article from which I
have taken this information, earned him a reputation for “reckless bravery and
stubborn patriotism.” Whether Stephen Decatur was truly patriotic I want to
consider in a moment. There is no doubt, however, that he was reckless. He died
in 1820, when only forty-one, from wounds suffered in a duel: an attempt to
prove who was “right” at the point of a gun -- something not merely reckless
but insane.
Nationalists resent and repudiate any
suggestion that criticism of one’s country might be an expression of love for
country -- for failing to live up to the highest and best in its history and
tradition. Few forces in the world today are more destructive of peace and
happiness than nationalism -- the exalting of one’s own country over all
others, regardless of the cost in human misery and suffering.
Patriotism, on the other hand, is love of one’s
country not because it is in every respect “best"; and certainly not because it
always has been or always will be “right” -- but simply because it is ours. Isn’t
that how parents love their children? Last Christmas a friend of mine who is a
professor in one of our law schools sent me a Christmas card with a picture of
his five children, several of them teenagers. In an e-mail I said: “How proud
you must be of your children.” He responded: “I’m proud of them 90% of the
time.” When I told that to a father of teenagers in the parish I was then serving,
he commented: “That's a very high percentage.” Both those fathers, however,
dearly love their children; not because they are “the best,” and certainly not
because they are perfect, but simply because the children are theirs: the fruit of their parents’ love.
Patriots love their country in a
similar way. A spokesman for patriotism is the German-American Carl Schurz.
Born in Cologne , Germany , in 1829, he came to this
country in 1852. An admirer of Abraham Lincoln, Schurz fought for the Union in our Civil War, rising to the rank of Major
General. After the war he was owner and editor of a German language newspaper
here in St. Louis ,
the Westliche Post. From 1869 to 1875, Schurz was one of Missouri’s two
Senators in Washington, where he opposed the punitive “Reconstruction” policy
imposed on the South by his own party after the Civil War. Taught as a
schoolboy at his Jesuit school in Cologne that there is a higher law which
stands above all human laws and judges them, Carl Schurz believed, like his
fallen hero, Lincoln, that this higher law required not punishment for the
southern states but reconciliation, to bind up the nation’s wounds.
In a Senate speech Carl Schurz quoted
Stephen Decatur’s words and responded to them. "Our country, right or wrong!
When right, to be kept right; when wrong to be put right!” That is the
voice of patriotism, which is a Christian virtue. Nationalism, which is pride
on a public scale, is incompatible with our Christian and Catholic faith.
The celebration of Independence Day should
remind us as Catholic Christians that we have dual citizenship. We are
citizens of our country, which we love because it is ours. But we are citizens
also of a higher realm: the invisible and spiritual kingdom of heaven. As
citizens of our country we work with all people of good will for justice and
peace: in our community, in our nation, and in the world. As citizens of God’s
kingdom we acknowledge a higher law than those made by Legislatures or
Congress. When those human laws command -- or, as in the case of abortion, when
they permit -- what God’s law forbids, we respond as the apostle Peter (whom we
celebrated with his companion Paul nine days ago) responded to the unjust
commands of authority in his day: “We must obey God rather than men” (Acts
5:29).
Appeal to this higher law evokes
today the angry protest that it amounts to imposing our special morality on a
pluralist society. Slave holders brought the same charge in the 1850s against
those who wanted to abolish slavery. “We’re not forcing you to own slaves” the
slaveholders said. “But don’t force your special morality on us.” Those who call themselves “pro-choice” make
the same argument today.
You have probably seen the bumper
stickers which say: “Against abortion? Don’t have one!” Would the people who
display that slogan put a sticker on their cars which said: “Against slavery?
Don’t own one!” They’d be ashamed. We are ashamed today of laws which permitted
slave holders to treat human beings as property. We pray that the day the day
will come when we will be no less ashamed of laws which permit us to treat innocent
babies in the womb as disposable bits of tissue which can be cut out like an
appendix and thrown away.
The Declaration of Independence,
which we have just celebrated, lists in first place among those truths which it
calls “self-evident” the “right to life.” Defending this right for all --
not just for the strong, the healthy, and the self sufficient but also for the
unborn, the aged, and the gravely ill -- earns us today the scorn and hatred of
people who consider themselves sophisticated and enlightened. They too are
among the wolves that threaten us today. In confronting them we have Jesus’
assurance in today’s gospel reading: “I have given you power to ‘tread upon
serpents’ and scorpions, and upon the full force of the enemy and nothing will
harm you ... Rejoice because your names are written in heaven.”
No comments:
Post a Comment