19th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year B. 1 Kings 19:4-8; John 6:41-51.
AIM: To deepen the hearers’ appreciation of the two eucharistic tables.
An African priest studying in Paris was asked by the
French priest with whom he lives and unable, because of illness, to celebrate
his regular 4 p.m. Mass for nuns in a nearby convent, to substitute for him.
When the African priest rang the convent doorbell at 3.55, the Sister who
answered was surprised to see an unfamiliar face. Since he was not wearing a
clerical collar, which in Paris
as in most European cities is worn by relatively few priests these days, she
thought the stranger was a street person asking for help. “I’m sorry,” she told
him. “We’re just about to have Mass. We can’t help you now. Come back later.”
Fifteen minutes later, the nuns called the rectory to ask where their priest
was. Imagine their embarrassment when they learned that they had just turned
him away.
Why did these good Sisters go without
Mass that day? It was not because they were bad people. It was simply because
the priest who came did not look like the person they were expecting. That
happened to Jesus repeatedly. His fellow Jews were expecting that God’s long
awaited anointed servant, the Messiah, would come dramatically, descending from
the clouds of heaven. Jesus was different.
And he was not dramatic. He was ordinary. When Jesus said, “I am the
bread that came down from heaven,” they thought he must be crazy. “Is this not
Jesus, the son of Joseph?” they asked. “Then how can he say, ‘I have come down
from heaven’?”
Jesus’ people knew about “bread from
heaven.” That was the manna with which God had fed their ancestors during their
desert wanderings. But the prophets also spoke of bread as the spiritual
nourishment which God gives to those who approach him in faith and try to do
his will. Isaiah, for instance, portrays God telling his people: “Come, you who
have no food ... Come to me and listen to my words; hear me, and you shall have
life”(55:1-3). Another prophet, Amos, warns the people that if they persist in
disobedience, God “will send a famine on the land, not hunger for bread ... but
for hearing the word of the Lord” (8:11). And Sirach says that if a person
keeps God’s law, wisdom “will nourish him with the bread of
understanding”(15:3).
So when Jesus said, “I am the bread
come down from heaven,” he was using the language of the prophets, but giving
it a deeper meaning. He was saying, in effect: ‘I am the life-giving bread of
which Isaiah speaks. I am the one who satisfies the hunger for God’s word
mentioned by Amos. I am Sirach’s bread of understanding and wisdom.’ Jesus’
people failed to understand him. Like the substitute priest ringing the convent
bell in Paris,
Jesus was too different, too unexpected.
Do we
really understand what Jesus tells us in today’s gospel? When Jesus says, “I am
the bread come down from heaven,” and “I am the bread of life,” we read those
words as a reference to the Eucharist. That is correct. Too often, however, we
forget that there are two tables at
the Eucharist: the table of the Lord’s body, but also the table of the word.
The first part of the Mass, the liturgy of the word, is not merely a
preparation for the “essential part”: consecration and communion. It is equally
important, and equally essential. The Second Vatican Council said in 1965: “The
church has always venerated the divine Scriptures as she venerates the body of
the Lord, insofar as she never ceases, particularly in the sacred liturgy, to partake
of the bread of life and to offer it to the faithful from the table of
the word of God and the body of Christ” (Verbum
Dei, 21).
The council was saying that we are
nourished not only by the Lord’s body and blood in communion; we are nourished
no less by hearing God’s word. In the same passage the Council says: “In the
sacred books the Father who is in heaven comes lovingly to meet his children,
and talks with them. And such is the force and power of the word of God that it
can serve the church as her support and vigor, and the children of the church
as strength for their faith, food for the soul, and a pure and lasting source
of spiritual life.”
Our first reading told how the prophet
Elijah journeyed “forty days and forty nights” in the strength of the food God
gave him through an angel. In the gospel Jesus speaks of how God strengthened
the whole people during their wanderings in the desert through manna, bread
from heaven. Though this bread gave them strength for their journey, it did not
make them immortal.
Jesus does not hesitate to claim,
however, that the food he gives does
impart immortality. “I am the living bread that came down from heaven,” he
says. “Whoever eats this bread will live forever.” Jesus means that for those
who eat the “living bread” which he gives, physical death will not be the end,
but only a way station on the journey to eternal life.
Jesus gives himself to us as this
“living bread” here in the Eucharist. He does so in two closely linked ways:
through his holy word, read and proclaimed in our midst; and through his
sacramental body and blood, given under the outward forms of bread and wine.
Unless we receive the food the Lord offers us at both tables, we risk being spiritually undernourished.
When we do partake of both tables,
however — listening devoutly to God’s word, and receiving the Lord’s body and
blood with due preparation and reverence — we begin to realize that the words
of today’s responsorial psalm are true:
“Taste and
see how good the Lord is; blessed the man who takes refuge in him.”