Homily for May 6th, 2017: John 6:60-69.
There is
something poignant about Peter’s response to Jesus’ challenging question: “Do
you also want to leave?” Many had already done so: “Many of [Jesus’] disciples
returned to their former way of life and no longer walked with him,” John tells
us before reporting Jesus’ challenge to the Twelve. What caused their departure
was Jesus’ refusal to soften his teaching about eating his flesh and drinking
his blood. “Let me solemnly assure you,” Jesus said, “if you do not eat the
flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.” (6:53).
That was strong meat indeed, especially for people whose dietary laws forbade
the consumption of blood in any form. Still today the kosher laws of observant
Jews require that the blood be drained from any meat offered for human
consumption. Jesus’ words are also the answer to Protestants who insist that
Jesus’ presence in the bread and wine of their Communion services is “purely
spiritual” and not real.
The apostle Peter
was, frankly, not the sharpest crayon in the box. His response to Jesus’
question, “Lord to whom shall we go?” suggests that he may not have understood
the meaning of Jesus’ strong words. Peter was captivated nonetheless by the One
who spoke them: “You have the words of everlasting life,” Peter responds.
Any preacher
who is faithful to his commission to preach the full gospel, and not just what
people want to hear, will encounter criticism and rejection. I say that from
personal experience. Preachers have a
two-fold task: to comfort the afflicted – but also to afflict the comfortable.
When I have said from the pulpit that marriage is possible only for one man and
one woman, I have been told: ‘That’s just one opinion.’ The answer is simple:
it is the teaching of the Bible, and of the Catholic Church. Told that this
teaching is “very hurtful to many of our parishioners,” I remain unfazed. The
Lord whose commission I hold to preach “the truth the whole truth, and nothing
but the truth,” will ask me one day whether I did that; or whether I abbreviated
his truth because someone might be uncomfortable and offended. Similarly with
the person who was offended by a homily which dealt in part with pornography –
which any priest who sits in the confessional soon learns is a serious problem
today – and in consequence could no longer attend our church. Jesus encountered
rejection. If we who serve him experience only smiles and affirmation, we must
ask whether we are doing our job.