THE GREATEST COMMANDMENT
31st Sunday in Ordinary
Time, Year B. Deut. 6:2-6; Mark 12:28b-34.
AIM: To help the hearers vote
with properly informed consciences
Are
you tired of politics? Are you fed up
with political ads and electioneering?
Which one of us would not say a hearty AYes@ to those questions?
Which of us will not be happy Tuesday evening, when the votes have
finally been cast and we can turn on our TVs and radios knowing that we won=t have to see or hear any more candidates or groups
trying to persuade us to give them them money and to vote their way?
In
this country we Catholic priests do not tell people who to vote for. We do not welcome political candidates to our
pulpits C even when we agree with their positions. Other church bodies do, as you know. What would happen if even one Catholic Church
permitted a political candidate to speak from its pulpit? We all know what would
happen. There would be an immediate outcry, in the media and in the halls of
Congress and state legislatures, claiming that the Catholic Church had violated
the sacred separation of church and state.
Some of the leading legal scholars in the country would volunteer their
services to prosecute a suit in federal court depriving us of our charitable
tax exemption.
If
we do not welcome candidates to our pulpits, or endorse individual candidates
or parties, this is not because we fear the consequences. The reason is quite different. Realizing that political decisions are often
complex, we treat people as adults, encouraging them to form their consciences
in the light of Catholic teaching, and then to make their own choices. That teaching begins by telling us: we have a
duty to participate. Here is what the
archbishop of just one diocese has told his people:
AAmerican
Catholics should be concerned about a whole range of issues that impact the
dignity of the human person. We embrace
what has been termed the consistent ethic of life that seeks not only to
protect human life in the womb, but [also] promotes human dignity throughout
the whole continuum of life. Yet, there
are certain public policy positions that disqualify a candidate from
consideration for our vote. A Catholic
in good conscience could not support an avowed racist or anti-Semite no matter
what other good policies this individual might support or even champion. Similarly, supporting a candidate who favors
public policies that permit the killing of over a million unborn children
[annually] is inconsistent with Catholic values. The right to life is the most fundamental of
all human rights. Without the right to
life, all other rights are meaningless.@
As
Catholic Christians we are called to love God, and to love our neighbor. We heard this command in our first reading,
and in the gospel. Love of God and
neighbor forbids us to base our vote simply on what serves our
self-interest. Defense of life, from
conception to natural death, has priority over any personal benefit.
Make
no mistake about it: the attack on life in our country has become truly
grave. The number of babies killed
before birth in our country since 1973 now exceeds 40 million. The United States today has the most
extreme abortion laws of any western democracy.
With the Supreme Court decision 12 years ago permitting the killing of a
baby during the actual birth process (so-called Apartial
birth abortion@) we have reached a new and horrifying stage in what
the last three popes have called C and
rightly C today=s Aculture of death.@ The President appoints Supreme Court justices
whenever there is a vacancy. The Senators we elect must confirm those
appointments, or reject them. The
decisions those justices make will have far-reaching consequences for decades
to come. Can anyone say it makes no
difference whom we choose on Tuesday?
There
are now influential and powerful people in our country who advocate that we
delay determinating a baby=s humanity until several days after birth, thus
allowing the child to be starved or dehydrated if he or she is severely
handicapped. Princeton University ,
my father=s alma mater, has, to its shame, given tenure to a
professor who openly espouses this view.
Euthanasia
and assisted suicide enjoy growing support C under
the guise of Adeath with dignity.@ The State of Oregon has already legalized assisted
suicide. TV programs tell us what a blessing euthanasia has been in the Netherlands .
They fail to tell us that in that small country, tiny by our standards, doctors
now kill a thousand people annually without their consent. Given the cost of
health care today, does anyone think that the safeguards written into
euthanasia laws will hold up once this new threat to life becomes widely
accepted and legal?
AYou
shall love your neighbor as yourself,@ Jesus
says in our gospel reading today. The
neighbor we are to love C not just with a warm fuzzy feeling inside, but with
costing care, concern, and sacrifice C
includes the weakest and most defenseless among us: the unborn, the newborn,
the aged and infirm, patients in nursing homes whose minds have gone ahead of
them; prisoners on death row and the victims whose lives their horrifying
crimes have wrecked and devastated.
In
an imperfect world no one candidate or party cares perfectly for all these
people. To quote our bishops a final
time:
AOur
moral framework does not easily fit the categories of right or left, Democrat
or Republican. Our responsibility is to
measure every party and platform by how its agenda touches human life and
dignity. Calls to advance human rights
are illusions if the right to life itself is subject to attack.@
As
we go into the voting booth on Tuesday we shall be deciding who, on balance,
will come closest to promoting policies and laws which enable our society to fulfill
Jesus’ command to love our neighbor.
Sometimes that decision is difficult; in other cases it is not difficult
at all.
On
this final Sunday before Tuesday=s
election, we pray for our country. We
pray that we and all our citizens may choose wisely C that we may choose life!
No comments:
Post a Comment