Homily for May 18th, 2016: Mark 9:38-40.
“There is no
one who performs a mighty deed in my name who can at the same time speak ill of
me,” Jesus tells his disciples who have found someone casting out demons in
Jesus’ name who was not among his followers. “For whoever is not against us is
for us,” Jesus explains. We find a strikingly similar incident in the Old
Testament book of Numbers.
During the 40 years’ wandering of
God’s people in the wilderness, Moses calls together 70 elders of the people,
who gather round the tent where God was worshipped. God comes down in a dark
cloud and speaks to Moses. “Taking some of the spirit that was on Moses,” the
text says, “he bestowed it on the 70 elders; and as the spirit came to rest on
them, they prophesied.” (Num. 11:24ff.) Two of the 70 elders, named Eldad and
Medad, didn’t make it to the assembly; but the spirit came on them nonetheless,
and they too prophesied. An unnamed young man reports this to Moses; and his
lieutenant Joshua urges Moses to stop Eldad and Medad. Moses refuses. “Would that all the people of
the Lord were prophets,” Moses says.
What is at
issue in both incidents is what we call today tolerance. There is a great
difference, however, in the tolerance affirmed by both Moses and Jesus, and the
basis for tolerance today. Modern tolerance rests on the belief that there is
no such thing as truth. There is only your truth and my truth. But truth itself doesn’t
exist, modern society says. Such a position would have been unthinkable to
Moses and Jesus.
Biblical
tolerance is based on the belief that there is good in all people of good will,
even if some of their beliefs may be mistaken. The Catholic Church holds that
there may be a kernel of truth even in positions which may be mistaken. Hence
we respond to people whose beliefs differ from ours not simply by condemnation,
but by affirming whatever is good and true in their positions. This is what
enabled Pope Francis, questioned aboard the plane which brought him back to
Rome from World Youth Day in Brazil about people, including priests, with an
attraction to their own sex: “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord
and has good will, who am I to judge?” In the media frenzy which followed the
Pope’s two conditions – searching for the Lord, and having good will – were
mostly ignored. Pope Francis has said more than once that he is “a son of the
Church.” He has changed no Catholic teaching, and does not intend to.
No comments:
Post a Comment