Wednesday, April 1, 2015

THE GROUNDS OF OUR EASTER FAITH


Easter Sunday, Year B: Acts 10:34a, 37-43; John 20:1-9.
AIM: To show that belief in the resurrection is not based on “tales artfully spun” (2 Pet. 1:16), but on solid evidence. 

          “If Christ has not been raised,” Paul writes in his first letter to the Corinthians, “our preaching is void of content, and your faith is empty too.” (1 Cor. 15:14). Is Christ’s resurrection really true? Or is it just a nice story? What  evidence do we have that the resurrection is true? There is evidence of three kinds: first, the empty tomb; second, the appearances of the risen Lord; and finally, the Church’s continuing experience of Jesus not as a dead hero, but as its living Lord.  Let me speak about each three.
1. The empty tomb
          The gospel we have just heard tells us that the empty tomb was discovered by Mary of Magdala, “early in the morning, while it was still dark.” The other three gospels report that the discovery was made by several women, after sunrise.  Is this discrepancy a reason to dismiss the whole story? Many people would say yes. In reality, however, different accounts are just what we should expect. Police, lawyers, and judges know that eye witnesses seldom agree about all the details of a particular event. It is perjurers who try to harmonize their stories in advance, to give them greater credibility.
          In one detail, however, all the accounts agree: that the first people to find Jesus’ tomb empty on Easter morning were women. That is significant. The legal system of Jesus’ day considered the testimony of women about as reliable as the testimony of a three-year-old child today. Had the gospel writers made up the story of the empty tomb, is it credible that they would have cited as their primary witnesses people whose testimony had little weight with their contemporaries?
class=Section2>
          By itself, however, the empty tomb does not prove the resurrection.  It could have been empty because the body had been moved. That is what all but one of Jesus’ friends believed at first. And Matthew says that Jesus’ enemies put out the story that the body had been moved in order to discredit the resurrection. If we accept this, however, we must believe that the entire preaching of the early Church was based upon a carefully concealed fraud; and that those who perpetrated this fraud were prepared to die for it. Friends, if you believe that, you’ll believe anything.
          One person alone came to faith in the resurrection on the evidence of the empty tomb alone. He is called in today’s gospel, and throughout the gospel which bears his name, “the disciple whom Jesus loved.” This same bond of love with the Master would permit this “disciple whom Jesus loved” to recognize the risen Lord before Peter and the others when, weary from a night of fruitless fishing on the lake, they saw Jesus standing on the nearby shore at dawn (cf. John 21:7). All the other disciples came to believe in Jesus’ resurrection not on the basis of the empty tomb, but only through the second kind of evidence 
2.  The appearances of the risen Lord.
          The gospels report that Jesus appeared after his resurrection only to those who had previously known him, loved him, and believed in him. As we heard Peter say in our first reading: after his resurrection, Jesus was visible “not to all the people, but to us, the witnesses chosen by God in advance, who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead.” None of the reports of the resurrection appearances contain any evidence of hallucination or wish-fulfillment. On the contrary, in every case those to whom Jesus appeared were initially skeptical or fearful, as if they were seeing a ghost. Only slowly and reluctantly did they come
class=Section3>
to believe that it was truly the Master they had known and loved, alive again in flesh and blood.
          This slowness of the witnesses to believe was due not only to the astonishing nature of the occurrence itself (for in all human experience, the dead do not come back to life). It was due also to a mysterious alteration in Jesus’ appearance. Jesus did not return to his old life. He was raised to a new life, beyond death. His appearance was changed. The mode of his existence was changed. He could appear and disappear at will.
          The empty tomb is the first evidence for Jesus’ resurrection. In itself, however, the empty tomb proved only that Jesus’ body was elsewhere. Save for the one disciple who was linked to Jesus by a special bond of love, none of his friends came to faith in the resurrection on the basis of the empty tomb alone. They became convinced only when they saw the risen Lord, talked with him, and ate with him.
          Had there been no further evidence for Jesus’ resurrection, we would expect his friends to become increasingly skeptical as the memory of their encounters with the risen Lord became ever more distant. In fact, precisely the opposite happened. In time, Jesus’ friends became not less but more certain of the resurrection. This deepening certainty can be explained only by the third kind of evidence for Jesus’ resurrection —
3.  The Church’s continuing experience of Jesus as her risen Lord.
          This evidence is available to us today. We cannot see the empty tomb. We have not seen the risen Lord. But we are members of that great family of God called the Catholic Church who experience Jesus not as a dead hero from the past, but as gloriously alive here and now. We encounter him in this way especially when we obey Jesus’ command at the Last Supper to“do this in my memory.”
          If Jesus were a dead hero from the distant past, the celebration of the eucharistic memorial which he left us would be tinged with sadness. Always and everywhere, however, when Christians have obeyed Jesus’ command at the Last Supper to “do this in my memory,” they have been filled with joy. We express this joy today in the Church’s characteristic Easter greeting: “Alleluia!” This untranslatable word expresses more fittingly than a word of known meaning something that is, at bottom, inexpressible: our overwhelming joy at knowing that the One whom we encounter here in the Eucharist is not a dead hero from the past, but our ever-present and risen Lord, gloriously alive for evermore, risen from the tomb holding, as we read in a striking image in the final book of the Bible, “the keys of death and the nether world” (Rev. 1:18). 
          This joyful encounter with the risen Lord is the continuation not merely of the Last Supper, but also of the meals which Jesus shared with his friends after the resurrection.  Peter referred to those meals in our first reading, when he spoke of Jesus appearing “to us ...who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead.”
          Because Jesus Christ is alive, we can live in confidence, in joy, and in hope.  The darkness of this age has been overpowered by the light of Him who is the world’s light. The power of evil, clearly evident in the morning headlines and on the evening news on television, is temporary. In raising his Son from death, God has shown that his power is stronger than evil. This world, with all its horrors, is still God’s world. Death, our final enemy, is not the end. The grave, which was for Jesus a temporary resting-place only on the way to a new and more glorious life, will be for us too the gateway to this same eternal life.
          Truly we have every reason to join in the church’s ecstatic Easter hymn:
                             This is the day the Lord has made;
                             Let us rejoice and be glad in it. Amen.  

No comments:

Post a Comment